DOWN THE RABBIT HOLE: This and that – and when is a conspiracy theory not a theory anymore

This week I am writing my column from the state of Maine. 

I am here writing a story about sailing on a windjammer out of Rockland, but I am always thinking and inquiring about going down a rabbit hole – and this trip was no different.

It has been interesting talking with people about their views from this part of the country.

I found out something this state does for some of its elections called “rank voting.”

Now this is an interesting idea. It’s where you vote for your top choice and rank the remainder – and the vote is tallied with the ranking in mind.

The group on the schooner tonight also began to talk about artificial intelligence and the state of our country – and even whether aliens exist and who killed JFK.

So, then we got a little deeper – and I mentioned I had read about something I am still trying to discover if it’s true or not.

In the past year or so, I have heard and read people talking about Nuremberg 2.0. 

It was rumored to have begun, but I can’t find anything about it in mainstream media, apparently from what I saw the evidence is supposedly being built by attorneys, doctors and even politicians around the world with a side note – the perpetrators cannot say, “I was just following orders.”

Have you read the Nuremberg Code’s 10 rules? 

If not, look it up and do your own research.

As for Nuremberg 2, “crimes against humanity” are being bandied around regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and the unnecessary deaths that ensued due to the vaccine. 

I won’t go into that here because doctors around the globe have researched and explained it in detail much better than I ever could.

But, it seems these doctors have done a good job of explaining it to the point where a number of the Nuremberg violations do seem to have been violated.

The abuser’s list of names goes on and on.

For example, Bill Gates (why has he suddenly become a mad scientist, wasn’t he a computer nerd?), Klaus Schwab (one would think he had learned a few things from WWII and his father), George Soros (the man no one seems to like, but he’s like a jack in the box that keeps popping up anyway).

And of course, Anthony Fauci – perhaps the actual mad scientist. 

The list goes on involving those from Pfizer and Moderna and more.

Will Nuremberg see a second round? If so, there might be some very concerned people soon.

As the title of this column mentions – when is a conspiracy theory just that, and when is it more?

Wasn’t it the CIA who coined the term conspiracy theory?

Let’s do a little of that with the name Hunter Biden. 

Does anyone think all his shenanigans is just a conspiracy?

Likely not, but the question then becomes when are the politicians going to stop talking and start acting?

Or better yet, can we vote in new politicians who aren’t as concerned about money as they are about the American people?

I just saw yesterday, there is a book supposed to be available called, “Report on the Biden Laptop.”

That book looks thick too.

It includes photos, text messages and emails – and the first page is a table of contents that includes chapters on everything from the motive, timeline and the four families – to business-related crimes including China, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Romania,Mexico, Serbia, Libya – and unreported income and gifts. 

Oh, and then there are chapters on sex-related crimes that go into prostitution and human trafficking, non-consensual pornography, drug-related crimes and influence peddling.

All I can say is if this is true, why is he still walking around attending state dinners? 

I know if you the reader had done these things you would be in the recesses of prison for infinity.

Where to find the book, you ask. You can go to Marco Polo and purchase the book – it will certainly be an interesting read.

And another tidbit – in breaking news recently, a U.S. District Judge out of Louisiana (Terry Doughty) ordered Biden officials to limit contact with social media companies.

Say what?

Does anyone think it is ridiculous that a judge must tell our government officials to stay away from social media, and especially since the TikTok tomfoolery not so long ago.

It was said to be a temporary injunction limiting the federal government from speaking with social media companies about online content, and it ruled Biden administration officials policing of social media posts likely violated the First Amendment. 

The idea is the Federal Government and other federal agencies do not have the right to suppress political views and other speech  “normally protected from government censorship.”

The lawsuit stated social media platforms had been pressured by Biden and other government agencies to “scrub disfavored views about Covid-19 health policies, the origins of the pandemic, the Hunter Biden laptop story, election security and other topics as well.” 

It was also noted in the lawsuit that social media platforms were bullied into suppressing views the administration did not promote such as criticism of mask mandates and saying no to the Covid-19 vax for children. 

It appears there were a number of emails found between the White House and social media executives. For example, one where a supposedly former White House director of digital strategy said YouTube was “funneling people into vaccine hesitancy.” 

Dystopian scenario and a bad road to be going down if true.

I know one thing I think we can all agree on, let’s respect and honor the First Amendment beginning at the government level.

Let’s put the Hunter Bidens where they belong, and let’s expect our politicians to do what the constituents want or move out of the way and let a better person for the job do it instead.

Rita Cook is a freelance writer for The Ellis County Press. She can be reached at rcook13@earthlink.net.